Woman Holding a Balance
(Vrouw met weegschaal)
c. 1662-1665
oil on canvas
16 3/4 x 15 in. (42.5 x 38 cm.)
The National Gallery, Washington D. C.
The Last Judgment
Jacob de Backer
c. 1580
140 x 105 cm
O.-L. Vrouwekathedraal, Antwerp
The so-called picture-within-a-picture that appears on the back wall portrays a Last Judgment. The artist of the Last Judgment has remained an enigma and no exact proto-type for this composition has been advanced. However, it appears to be the work of a late 16th-century Flemish painter. One distinct possibility suggested by Pieter J. J. van Thiel, is Jacob de Backer (Antwerp 1540 - 1595), a student of Frans Floris and an artist who specialized in similar Last Judgment scenes. One peculiar characteristic of this composition that is often found in De Backer's works is the image of Christ with both arms raised. Vermeer probably owned this painting, or at least had it as a part of his stock as an art dealer.

Mirrors appear four times in Vermeer's slim oeuvre. A smaller one hangs in the same position in the Woman with a Pearl Necklace. Both frames are presumably made out of ebony although Dutch artisans excelled in producing imitations of precious imported woods. Mirrors have always been represented in a great number of Western paintings throughout history. Their iconographic associations are numerous and frequently contradictory, ranging from the sense of sight to indications of pride and vanity.
Some scholars believe that the mirror might, in fact, identify the picture as a Vanitas theme. However, most modern scholars, including Edward Snow and Albert Blankert, point out that the pervasive serenity of the painting is more in keeping with those positive metaphorical associations traditionally connected with the mirror: self-knowledge and truth.
According to Cesare Ripa in his Iconologia, a mirror is one of the attributes of Prudence (see above), for with it the woman achieves self-knowledge. Just as a mirror reflects reality, so does man accurately understanding when he comprehends the true character of the physical world. Otto van Veen related the elements of truth and love to a mirror's reflection in his emblem "Cleer and Pure." It is also an attribute of Truth. Vermeer certainly knew Ripa's Iconologia since two of his allegorical paintings were composed with its aid.


The same white cap which is worn by the young woman in the Woman Holding a Balance was represented in other paintings by Vermeer (see details left) and in many genre paintings of the time both tied and open. Marieke de Winkel, Dutch costume expert, explains that it was partly ornamental and served to protect the hairdo before and after dressing.
In the inventory of Vermeer's wife, Catharina Bolnes, three such caps were listed "drye witte kappen" although it was also called a hooftdoek in Delft. It was worn in informal situations and typically made of white linen, sometimes of nettlecloth or cotton.
This type of elegant jacket was typically worn by middle and upper class women. It protected them against the cold during the long Dutch winters as they performed household chores. It should be remembered that their houses were warmed by a fire-place only in the living room and kitchen. The jacket's loose fit permitted freedom of movement. Dutch costume expert Marieke de Winkel explains that these jackets were worn by women at home on weekdays already at an earlier date (than that of the painting) and are still mentioned in inventories in the 18th century. Before the 1650s and after the 1660s however, they were no longer depicted in art.
They were frequently lined with fur but sometimes only edged. Occasionally the fur lining was detachable so that it could be taken out in summer. It was a usage to store away fur (garments) in May. It does not seem logical they were worn during very hot days. Inventories do mention unlined jackets for use during the summer months. A popular misconception regarding the jacket is that the white fur trim was ermine. De Winkel points out that even in the inventories of the wealthiest women this particular fur is never mentioned. In fact the ermine is not usually mentioned but typical kinds would have been white squirrel or cat. The jackets were called jack in Amsterdam but manteltge (small mantle) in Delft.

A comparable kind of yellow garment is worn by the seated mistress in Vermeer's Mistress and Maid in the Frick (detail left). The skirt of the Frick painting with a red ribbon can be traced without interruption from the illuminated triangle of opening of the jacket to underneath the inferior band of fur trim immersed in deep shadow proving that it is a unique garment. The red ribbon is not braiding, because at that time braiding would reach to the lower edge of the skirt. The skirt was always closed at the front and tied with two strings. This also explains why at the Frick painting, the two string stand apart a bit and then overlap. This would be very strange for (stitched on) braids.
The deep blue tablecloth massed on the extendable table is similar in fold, color and position to the one seen in Vermeer's Woman with a Pearl Necklace, a painting that bares a strong resemblance to Woman Holding a Balance.
Before the recent restoration of the painting, it appeared greenish in tone due to the heavy yellow varnish which covered the entire painting. Blue is the most sensitive color to discoloring varnish. The meandering folds of the tablecloth provide a counterpoint to the severe geometric framework of the composition. Laboratory examinations reveal that Vermeer used charcoal black and natural ultramarine blue to render its color.

Three different types of containers lie open upon the table in front of the young woman. The largest one, a jewelry box, appears very similar to those found in two other of Vermeer's works of the same years. The red velvet lining of its open lid recalls that of the Woman with a Water Pitcher (detail left).
A gold chain, which appears only once in Vermeer's oeuvre, hangs over the lid of the box near a pearl necklace. The pearl necklace lying on the table has been rendered in a different way.

The extendable table seen in the Woman Holding a Balance appears to be the same one that Vermeer used in other interiors. This kind of table was represented infinite times in Dutch painting of the time and would have been considered a luxury item. One painted example is featured in a A Man Weighing Gold (c. 1670) by Cornelis de Mann (detail left).
The Rijksmuseum possesses a similar table. The legs have a striking bulbous form. The remarkable bun-shaped feet later provided the Dutch name of this style of furniture — balpoot. In the 17th century, however, this type of table was known as a draw-leaf table because it could be extended by pulling out extra leaves. The frame below the tabletop is decorated with volutes. Under this, the legs are joined by a double Y-frame stretcher. A thin veneer of rosewood has been cemented to the oak. Some parts have been decorated with ebony. The table measures 78.5 x 125 x 84. cm.

Scales such as this were kept in special cases which at times were elaborately decorated. For a long time each district of the United Provinces had its own system of weights and measures. In order to prevent fraud it was necessary to keep a constant check not only on the amount of goods but also on coins. For this purpose a merchant would sometimes use coins from different regions, and using coin weights he would check whether the coins with witch he had been paid had the prescribed weight. This prevented unscrupulous merchants from clipping the edges of the coins to save money.
Microscopic examination has resolved one of the principle disputes regarding the painting: the woman is not weighing gold as was suggested by the first description of the painting in the catalogue of the Jacob Dissius auction in 1696. What have been long interpreted as glints of golden substance are in reality, yellowish highlights on the fore edges of the scale's two pans. Accordingly, Vermeer expert Arthur Wheelock believes the young woman is waiting for the two pans of the scale to come into balance. However, Walter Liedtke, another renowned Vermeer expert, asserts that the absence of anything on the scale does not outweigh the evidence of the gold coins on the corner of the table, near the stack of weights (which like the balance, has been taken from its box). Liedtke believes that it is only too evident that she is about to weigh gold. However, both conclude that the central message of the painting is that one should conduct one's life with temperance and balanced judgment. This assertion is born out by stylistic evidence as well. Both the geometrical center and the vanishing point of the painting lay very close to the woman's out-held hand directing the viewer's attention to the balancing scales.

On the table lies a pearl necklace, a jewelry box, assorted gold and silver coins and a smaller box which opens up towards the young woman which most likely held the balance and the weights. Arthur Wheelock, one of the most authoritative Vermeer scholars, pointed out that personifications of conscience appeared as engraved labels on coin-weight boxes, similar to the one in Vermeer's painting. In an example from the 17th century, the figure of conscience is a woman holding scales and a flaming heart. According to this interpretation of Vermeer's painting, the scales balanced by the woman signify the internal workings of one's conscience and the moral decisions made by men and women on earth that will be weighed in heaven. A third very small box whose lid lies detached to the right may have contained the coins which lie near the edge of the table. The four coins, one silver and three gold, will presumably be weighed.
- signature
- date
- provenance
- technical description
- the painting with its frame
- how big is this picture?
- related works 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Woman with a Balance provides us not with a warning but with comfort and reassurance; it makes us feel not vanity of life but its preciousness. Against the violent baroque agitation of the painting behind her, the woman asserts a quite, imperturbable calm, the quintessence of Vermeer's vision.
Edward A. Snow, A Study of Vermeer, 1979
No signature appears on this work.
c. 1664
Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. Vermeer: The Complete Works, New York, 1997)
c. 1663-1664
Walter Liedtke Vermeer: The Complete Paintings, New York, 2008)
The support is a fine, plain-weave linen with a thread count of 20 x 16 per cm². The original tacking edges are present. The canvas has been glue lined.
The ground is a warm buff color containing chalk, lead white, black and an earth pigment.
The layer structure of the paint is varied, creating different effects and textures, from thick impasto to thin glazes and scumbles. The edges of forms are rarely hard, but overlap only slightly or do not quite touch, allowing the ground to show through. Almost all areas were painted wet-in-wet. In selected areas of the painting, especially in the blue jacket, a dark, reddish-brown undermodeling is visible, particularly the shaded folds. A gray-green underpaint is found in many shadowed areas. The vanishing point of the composition is visible as a small, white spot on the x-radiograph, to the left of the hand holding the balance. The balance was enlarged, as can be seen in the infrared reflectogram. The ground and paint are in a good state of preservation.
*Johannes Vermeer (exh. cat., National Gallery of Art and Royal Cabinet of Paintings Mauritshuis - Washington and The Hague, 1995, edited by Arthur Wheelock)
literature

- (?) Pieter Claesz van Ruijven, Delft (d. 1674); (?) his widow, Maria de Knuijt, Delft (d. 1681);
- (?) their daughter, Magdalena van Ruijven, Delft (d. 1682);
- (?) her widower, Jacob Abrahamsz Dissius (d. 1695);
- Dissius sale, Amsterdam, 16 May 1696, no. 1;
- Isaac Rooleeuw, Amsterdam (1696-1701); Rooleeuw sale, Amsterdam 20 April 1701, no. 6;
- Paulo van Uchelen, Amsterdam (1701-d.1702);
- Paulo van Uchelen the Younger; Amsterdam (1703-54);
- Anna Gertruijda van Uchelen, Amsterdam (1754-d.1766);
- Van Uchelen sale, Amsterdam, 18 March 1767, no. 6, to Kok;
- Nicolaas Nieuhoff sale, Amsterdam, 14 April 1777, no. 116, to Van den Boogaerd;
- Trochel et al. sale, Amsterdam, 11 May 1801, no. 48, to Van der Schley;
- King Maximilian I Jozef, Nymphenburg (before 1825);
- King of Bavaria sale, Munich, 5 December 1826, no. 101 [as by Metsu], to Caraman;
- Victor-Louis-Charles de Riquet, duc de Caraman, Paris (1826-30);
- Caraman sale, Paris, 10 May 1830, no. 68;
- Casimir Périer, Paris (1830-32); Périer heirs, Paris (1832-48);
- Périer sale, London (Christie's), 5 May 1848, no. 7, [bought in];
- Auguste Casimir Victor Laurent Périer, Paris (1848-76);
- Jean Paul Pierre Casimir Périer, Paris (1876-1907);
- comtesse de Ségur-Périer, Paris (1907-11);
- [Colnaghi, London, and Knoedler, New York, 1911];
- Peter A.B. Widener, Lynnewood Hall, Elkins Park, Philadelphia (1911-15);
- Joseph E. Widener, Lynnewood Hall, Elkins Park, Philadelphia (1915-d.1942);
- since 1942 National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Widener bequest (acc. no. 1942.9.97).
exhibitions


Owing to the intimate nature of Vermeer's art, there has been an inclination to link the painter's family members to the sitters of his paintings, some of which seemed to have posed more than once. The economic advantage of employing sitters from the artist's family circle willing to pose long hours without pay would be obvious. Some Vermeer scholars, including Arthur Wheelock of the National Gallery, believe that Vermeer's wife Catharina posed more than once and may be a candidate for this picture. The same woman also posed in the Girl Reading a Letter by an Open Window (bottom left) and Woman in Blue Reading a Letter (top left).
She has the same high brow, straight nose and wide-spaced eyes and also appears to be pregnant in the Rijksmuseum work. Perhaps she is the most lovely of Vermeer's models who have never been held to be beauties in the conventional sense of the word. Their beauty derives from the way they are painted.
Catharina, who was one year older than her husband, would have been approximately 32 years old when the Woman Holding a Balance was painted, if we are to agree with the painting's generally accepted date of c. 1664. However, there are no surviving images of her and therefore we cannot make any comparison. After having lost a child in 1660, Catharina bore her first son Johannes, about three years later, c. 1663-1664. In the years that followed, she must have spent most of her time pregnant since she bore Vermeer 15 children before the artist died in 1675.
Although to modern viewers it seems quite obvious that the young woman is pregnant, there exist sound reason to believe this it not the case. Marieke de Winkel, an expert of the history of costume, offers substantial evidence in regards in her essay, "The Interpretation of Dress in Vermeer's Paintings." According to De Winkel, pregnancy "was not a common subject in art and there are very few depictions of maternity wear. Even in religious paintings such as the Visitation, where depictions of pregnant women is required, the bodies of the Virgin and Saint Elizabeth were usually completely concealed by draperies." De Winkel further argues that "to my knowledge there are no examples of pregnant women in Dutch portraiture, an interesting fact considering that many women were painted in their first year of marriage, a time when they could have been with child."
Arthur Wheelock also believes that the young woman is not pregnant but for a different reason. He observes from numerous paintings by Vermeer's contemporaries, that Dutch fashions in the mid-17th century seemed to have encouraged a bulky silhouette. The impression of the short jacket worn over a thickly padded skirt in Vermeer's painting in particular may create just such an impression.
The Moneylender
Gerrit Dou
1664
29 x 23 cm
Musée du Louvre, Paris
While generally accepted as an allegory, Woman Holding a Balance has been interpreted in many ways. Early authors assumed that the pans of the woman's balance contained gold or pearls. Consequently, the painting was described until recently as either the Gold-weigher or the Woman Weighing Pearls. Thus the Last Judgment was seen as a warning that the woman should not be distracted by weighing earthly goods and focus on eternal values. In this interpretation the woman is associated with of the iconographic tradition of the goldweigher and its consequential Vanitas connotations (see left). In addition, some contemporary authors speculate that the woman is pregnant while others conclude that her costume reflects a style of dress current in the early to mid-1660s. Others interpret the painting theologically, viewing the woman as a secularized image of the Virgin Mary, who, standing before the Last Judgment, assumes the role of intercessor and compassionate mother.
One scholar argues that the image of a pregnant Virgin Mary contemplating balanced scales would have been understood by a Catholic viewer as an anticipation of Christ's life, his sacrifice, and the eventual foundation of the Church. Vermeer expert Arthur K. Wheelock Jr. noted that the scales are in fact empty and thus, she is portrayed in the act of balancing rather than weighing. According to Wheelock, who correlates the mood of profound serenity of the picture with this fact, believes that "the essential message is that one should conduct one's life with temperance and balanced judgment. Indeed this message, with or without its explicit religious context, appears in paintings from all phases of Vermeer's career and must, therefore, represent one of his fundamental beliefs. The balance, an emblem of Justice, and eventually of the final judgment; denotes the woman's responsibility to weigh and balance her own action."

The Woman Holding a Balance is perhaps Vermeer's most successful composition. In no other work does composition so effectively compliment the theme and emotional setting of the painting. The pervasive yet unobtrusive geometry, the interplay of verticals and horizontals against the diagonals, mass against void, and light against dark, create a balanced but subtly dynamic composition. The geometrical center (the point where the two white lines converge) of the painting falls very near the upheld hand of the young woman, almost at the pivot of the balance, the painting's thematic heart. Moreover, the vanishing point of the work's perspective system, which is derived by extending the converging orthogonal lines of the table, mirror and floor tiles (pink lines), falls very near the same point. Thus, the thematic (the act of balancing), the geometric and the perspective centers of the painting coincide unifying its diverse realities. The composition of the Woman Holding a Balance is all the more admirable because it is achieved with such subtlety that it in no way interferes with a naturalistic reading of the painting.

This work is almost certainly the first painting listed in the 1696 Amsterdam sale of 21 paintings by Vermeer: "A young lady weighing gold, in a box by J. van der Meer of Delft, extraordinarily artful and vigorously painted. " It sold for 155 guilders, second to the Milkmaid at 175 guilders. The two paintings were, and still are, considered among the finest works by the artist's hand. Even the monumental View of Delft, many times larger, fetched only 35 guilders more. Moreover, the Woman Holding a Balance is the only Vermeer that can be traced back in an unbroken line to the 17th century.
A Woman Drinking with Two Men (detail)
Pieter de Hooch
c. 1658
73.7 x 64.6
National Gallery, London
The left-hand corner represented in this painting cannot be identified with any other of Vermeer's interiors since the structure of the window, which furnishes the most significant means for identification, cannot be seen. However, it was most likely similar to ones represented in Vermeer's other interiors. Such windows were typically composed of four casements. The bottom two casements had shutters on the outside (see the detail of Vermeer's Little Street) and at times, two upper shutters attached on the inside (see detail left). The shutters controlled incoming light and air flow. In Vermeer's Woman Holding a Balance it seems that only the top shutters were left open. Presumably, the window faced north. Painters have always preferred a northern exposition for their studios since the cooler northern light is relatively constant throughout the working day. Dutch paintings of the time predominantly represent the left side of the room. The origin of this compositional formula may be linked to the fact that artists usually painted with the light source coming from their left, so that the shadow projected by their own hand did not disturb their work.

A string of pearls with a yellow ribbon closure lies between the smaller container and the container of the balance and weights. Vermeer's women are often associated with the pearls eleven of them wear, so much that his oeuvre itself has become synonymous with the pearl. In 1908 Jan Veth articulated a widespread sentiment while observing Girl with a Pearl Earring: "More than with any other VERMEER one could say that it looks as if it were blended from the dust of crushed pearls." In the seventeenth-century pearls were probably an extremely important status symbol. In 1660 Samuel Pepys (an English diarist) paid 4 1/2 pounds for a pearl necklace, and in 1666 he paid 80 pounds for another, which at the time amounted to about 45 and 800 guilders respectively. At about the same time the traveling French art connoisseur Balthasar de Monconys had been shown a single-figured painting by Vermeer which had been paid 600 guilders and that he considered the price outrageous. Pearls are linked with vanity but also with virginity - a very wide iconographic spectrum.
Johann Sebastian Bach
BWV 639, organ prelude to chorale Ich ruf zu dir, Herr Jesu Christ, (I call to Thee Lord Jesus Christ) [3.91 MB]
http://www.lastfm.de/music/Ton+Koopman/_/Chorale+-+%22Ich+ruf+zu+dir,+Herr+Jesu+Christ%22+BWV+639+(Studio)
A Dutch silver ducat.
Although the painting's earlier titles indicate that the woman is weighing pearls or gold, recent microscopic examination has shown that there is nothing on the pans of her scales. Thus, Vermeer has chosen to portray the moments when the scales comes to balance. The only things on the table that could be weighed are coins.
Using the five coins as a starting point, historian Timothy Brook opens a window out of Vermeer's painting onto the globalization of the world. In the 17th century, coins were much softer than they are today and were also clipped by thieves. The real value of a coin was determined by the weight of its precious metal rather than its face value. Thus, a diligent household periodically weighed all its coins to establish their effective worth.
Brook has conjectured that the large silver coin near the four stacked gold coins is a ducat and not a guilder. There were various types of silver coins in circulation but the most common was the ducat. In Europe, two silver ducats were worth one gold ducat.
Vermeer lived in a time, also known as the silver century, when silver had become available in enormous quantities. All over the globe, business transactions were done in silver. Although the practical use of silver was confined to decorative purposes, silver had become the universal measure of wealth. Principle suppliers of silver were Japan and South America. The Chinese accumulated huge amounts of silver since they were not interested in making transactions with European goods but accepted silver payemnts for the porcelain, silk clothing and other exotic goods they produced and had become the rage in Europe. Furthermore, in China, one unit of gold could be bought for six units of silver instead of the twelve in Europe.
Although there were some silver mines in Germany and Austria, the great bulk of silver which reached the ports of Amsterdam and London came from Spanish mines in Peru. Much of it came from the desolate boom town of Petosí. Founded in 1546 as a mining town, it soon produced fabulous wealth, becoming one of the largest cities in the Americas and the world with a population exceeding 200,000 people. In Spanish there is still a saying, valer un potosí, "to be worth a potosí" (that is, "a fortune").





