Thoré, [Etienne-Joseph-] Théophile
born: 1807, La Flèche, France
died: 1869, Paris, France
The "rediscovery" of Vermeer is predominantly attributed to scholar, collector, French Salon critic and co-founder of L'Alliance des arts, Etienne Joseph Théophile Thoré (1807–1869), sometimes, Thoré-Bürger, Thoré or Willem Bürger.
Thoré wrote criticism beginning in the 1830s, during the regime of the July Monarchy (1830–1848). By the 1840s his art criticism was wide ranging encompassing aesthetic and political views. He extolled the work of Eugène Delacroix, Théodore Rousseau and other Barbizon school painters, chiding the conservative painters such as Jean-Auguste-Dominique Ingres as well as the more popular artists such as Paul Delaroche and Horace Vernet. In 1842 he and Paul Lacroix (1806–1884) founded a private agency to sell and promote art, the Alliance des Arts. They also published a Bulletin. Between 1844–8 Thoré was the art critic for Le Constitutionnel. Because of his support of some of the radicals in the 1848 revolution, (he was a Saint-Simonist and exponent of Pierre Leroux, 1797–1871) was forced into exile in 1849. He returned in 1859, continuing to write under the government of Second Empire (1851–Gazette deand connoisseur, he is credited with the rediscovery of Johannes Vermeer and significant re-evaluations of other seventeenth-century Dutch artists, including Frans Hals.
His criticism derided French baroque painting as too heavily influenced by Italy, terming it as inauthentic of a national identity. He lauded Dutch seventeenth-century naturalism and what has subsequently come to be seen as the acme of Netherlandish painting, the art of the Dutch Republic. It's direct appeal to simple human virtues, he declared made it an art for the people ("l'art pour l'homme"). He continued to deplore the dark history painting of the Academie and the Second Empire, particularly that of Jean-Léon Gérôme and Alexandre Cabanel, in favor of Realism painter such as Gustave Courbet (his favorite), Jean-François Millet, and the Impressionists Edouard Manet, Claude Monet, and Auguste Renoir. As early as 1860, Thoré began purchasing Vermeer paintings. A Lady Standing at a Virginal (1672–1673, National Gallery, London) was acquired sometime before 1876, Woman with a Pearl Necklace (1664, Berlin, Gemäldegalerie) was bought from Henry Grevedon in June 1866. A Lady Seated at a Virginal (1675, National Gallery, London) was purchased for a mere 2,000 francs in 1867. The sale of his collection by in 1892 brought the Vermeers and other works into more public collections.from:
Dictionary of Art Historians
by Frances Suzman Jowell
"My picture mania relates above all to works which can help with my historical researches. I have already collected some paintings that are interesting from this point of view, and I will end up by having a rather unusual gallery of bric-à-brac." So wrote the republican critic Théophile Thoré (1807–1869), a year after returning from his ten-year exile from France. He was also known then by his pseudonym, W. Bürger, the author of several scholarly and critical publications on collections of European art, and special champion of the Dutch seventeenth-century school.
Back in Paris, Bürger soon resumed his former role as art critic with a series of controversial Salon reviews, while continuing with his historical researches and publications, and his energetic collecting of paintings until his death in 1869.
During this decade he also played an important role in the art market, and made himself indispensable to several collectors as adviser and negotiator, art historian and critic. Consulted by museum directors, collectors, dealers, critics, art historians and artists, he had a significant and lasting influence on the ways in which the art of the past (and contemporary art) was viewed, valued and interpreted.
Bürger did not himself have the financial means to acquire paintings on anything like the scale of the major European collectors with whom he was associated. Nevertheless, his collection, informed by his avid researches and his energetic search for related works, soon developed well beyond a "somewhat unusual gallery of bric-à-brac."
By 1867, when he wrote his well-informed and lively chapter on private collections in Paris for the Paris guide, published to coincide with the Universal Exhibition (Exposition Universelle), Bürger included his own collection, albeit grouped with the more modest ones of other authors who contributed to the Guide: "W. Bürger himself has several pictures, mostly by Dutch artists, and naturally he finds them the most beautiful in the world; let us say that he has some rarities interesting for the history of the northern schools, amongst others, his van der Meer of Delft, his Fabritius, Metsu, Pieter de Hooch, Jan Steen, Hals, de Keyser, Rubens and Jordaens; and some modern artists: Eugène Delacroix, Théodore Rousseau, Jules Dupré, Diaz, Courbet etc." He added that these "simple collections of artists and writers" were only temporary locations for paintings destined for more important galleries.
Many of the paintings once owned by Thoré-Bürger would, as he hoped, eventually find themselves placed in "important galleries"- a few with pride of place in major public and private collections; some less celebrated but nevertheless respectably housed. The current whereabouts of most of them, however, are unknown.
Frances Suzman Jowell, "Thoré-Bürger's art collection: "a rather unusual gallery of bric-à-brac," in Simiolus: Netherlands quarterly for the history of art, vol.30, 2003 no. 1/2, pp. 54-55
"Rediscovery," in Vermeer
2002, pp. 102–104
Théophile Thoré, the French critic and politician, in the first major study of Vermeer, published in the Gazette des Beaux-Arts in 1866 under the pseudonym of W. Bürger. "A dozen years ago, Jan van der Meer of Delft was almost unknown in France," wrote Thoré. "His Name was missing from the biographies and histories of painting; his works were missing from the museums and private collections."
1807–1869 HE WAS A MAN
IL FÛT UN HOMME
Thoré devoted twenty years of travel and research, in part as a political exile (hence the pseudonym), on this study of Vermeer, and in it he established not only the foundation but much of the edifice of our modern understanding of Vermeer. He begins his study with an account of his own first encounter with the View of Delft. "In the museum at the Hague, a superb and most unusual landscape captures the attention of every visitor and powerfully impresses artists and connoisseurs. It is the view of a town, with a quay, old gatehouse, buildings in a great variety of styles of architecture, garden walls, trees and, in the foreground, a canal and a strip of land with several figures. The silver-gray sky and the tone of the water somewhat recalls Philip Koninck. The brilliance of the light, the intensity of the color, the solidity of the paint in certain parts, the effect that is both very real and nevertheless original, also have something of Rembrandt.
"When I visited the Dutch museums for the first time, around 1842, this strange painting surprised me as much as The anatomy lesson and the other remarkable Rembrandts in the Hague museum. Not knowing to whom to attribute it, I consulted the catalogue: View of the Town of Delft, beside a canal, by Jan van der Meer of Delft'. Amazing! Here is someone of whom we know nothing in France, and who deserves to be known!
"Even after seeing the Night Watch, the Syndics [by Rembrandt] and the other marvels of the Amsterdam museum, I retained an indelible memory of its masterpiece—by van der Meer of Delft! Well! In those days, we all thought of painting as something to please the eye and to write elegant descriptions for, without worrying too much about the history of art and artists.
"Later, even before 1848, having returned to Holland several times, I also had the opportunity of visiting the principal private galleries, and in that of M. Six van Hillegom—the happy owner of the celebrated portrait of his ancestor, Burgomaster Jan Six, by Rembrandt—there I found two more extraordinary paintings: a Servant pouring milk and the Façade of a Dutch house,—by Jan van der Meer of Delft! The astounding painter! But, after Rembrandt and Frans Hals, is this van der Meer, then, one of the foremost masters of the entire Dutch School? How was it that one knew nothing of an artist who equals, if he does not surpass, Pieter de Hooch and Metsu?
"Later after 1848 having become, of necessity, an exile, and, by instinct, a cosmopolitan, living in turn in England, Germany, Belgium and Holland, I was able to explore the museums of Europe, collect traditions, read, in all languages, books on art, and attempt to untangle somewhat the still confused history of the Northern schools, especially the Dutch school, of Rembrandt and his circle -and my 'sphinx' van der Meer.
"In the first volume of The Museums of Holland, in 1858, drew attention to the landscape in the Hague museum and the two pictures in the Six van Hillegom collection In 1860, in the second volume of The Museums of Holland, I authenticated more than a dozen van der Meers, and brought together a quantity of information that enabled me later to recover almost the entire oeuvre of the painter of the View of Delft. "This obsession has caused me considerable expense. To see one picture by van der Meer, I traveled hundreds of miles: to obtain a photograph of another van der Meer, I was madly extravagant. I even retraced my steps all round Germany in order to verify with conviction works dispersed between Cologne, Brunswick, Berlin, Dresden, Pommersfelden and Vienna. But I was amply recompensed, more especially as I had the pleasure, not only of admiring the works in museums and galleries, but in acquiring more than a dozen, some that I bought for my friends MM. Pereire, Double, Cremer and others; others that I bought for myself.
"At the same time as I was researching van der Meer's pictures, I was gathering together all the written documents and traditions concerning the man: I leafed through old books, old catalogues, the Dutch archives. "On the biography, it is true that I have still only some chronological landmarks and a few certain facts "
Thoré knew little of Vermeer's life. He knew nothing of his marriage or even the date of his death. When he found the catalogue of the sale in Amsterdam of 16 May, 1696, at which, in addition to the View of Delft, twenty other Vermeers were listed, he surmised that the sale may have followed the recent death of the artist, or had been of the effects of another Van der Meer, of Haarlem, who had also been a picture dealer and had died, so he had learned, in 1691."